Original Research Articles

Download PDF (218.82 KB)

AORTA, July 2013, Volume 1, Issue 2:96-101
DOI: 10.12945/j.aorta.2013.13-014

Painless Type B Aortic Dissection: Insights From the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection

Jip L. Tolenaar, MD1, Stuart J. Hutchison, MD2, Dan Montgomery, MS3, Patrick O'Gara, MD4, Rosella Fattori, MD5, Reed E. Pyeritz, MD, PhD6, Linda Pape, MD7, Toru Suzuki, MD8, Arturo Evangelista, MD9, Frans L. Moll, MD, PhD10, Vincenzo Rampoldi, MD1, Eric M. Isselbacher, MD11, Cristoph A. Nienaber, MD, FACC12, Kim A. Eagle, MD, FACC3, Santi Trimarchi, MD, PhD1*

1Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Policlinico San Donato IRCCS, Milan, Italy;

2St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada;

3University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan;

4Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts;

5S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy;

6Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania;

7University of Massachusetts Hospital, Worcester, Massachusetts;

8Department of Cardiology, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan;

9Hospital General Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain;

10University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands;

11Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts;

12Thoracic Aortic Center, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany

Abstract

Introduction:

The classical presentation of a patient with Type B acute aortic dissection (TBAAD) is characterized by severe chest, back, or abdominal pain, ripping or tearing in nature. However, some patients present with painless acute aortic dissection, which can lead to a delay in diagnosis and treatment. We utilized the International Registry on Acute Aortic Dissections (IRAD) database to study these patients.

Methods:

We analyzed 43 painless TBAAD patients enrolled in the database between January 1996 and July 2012. The differences in presentation, diagnostics, management, and outcome were compared with patients presenting with painful TBAAD.

Results:

Among the 1162 TBAAD patients enrolled in IRAD, 43 patients presented with painless TBAAD (3.7%). The mean age of patients with painless TBAAD was significantly higher than normal TBAAD patients (69.2 versus 63.3 years, P = 0.020). The presence of atherosclerosis (46.4% versus 30.1%, P = 0.022), diabetes (17.9% versus 7.5%; P = 0.018), and other aortic diseases (8.6% versus 2.3%, P = 0.051), such as prior aortic aneurysm (31% versus 18.8% P = 0.049) was more common in these patients. Median delay time between presentation and diagnosis was longer in painless patients (median 34.0 versus 19.0 hours; P = 0.006). Dissection of iatrogenic origin (19.5% versus 1.3%; P < 0.001) was significantly more frequent in the painless group. The in-hospital mortality was 18.6% in the painless group, compared with an in-hospital mortality of 9.9% in the control group (P = 0.063).

Conclusion:

Painless TBAAD is a relatively rare presentation (3.7%) of aortic dissection, and is often associated with a history of atherosclerosis, diabetes, prior aortic disease including aortic aneurysm, and an iatrogenic origin. We observed a trend for increased in-hospital mortality in painless TBAAD patients, which may be the result of a delay in diagnosis and management. Therefore, physicians should be aware of this relative rare presentation of TBAAD.

Introduction

The classical presentation of a patient with acute aortic dissection (AAD) is characterized by severe chest, back, or abdominal pain. However, previous reports showed that between 5 and 17% of all dissection patients present with painless acute aortic dissections [1,2]. As expected, atypical presentation can lead to a delay in diagnosis, which is associated with higher mortality [3,4]. Painless Type B acute aortic dissection (TBAAD) does not mean that these patients have uncomplicated dissections, as they still can develop malperfusion and aortic rupture [1,2]. Immediate adequate medical treatment is essential and has to include optimal blood pressure control in order to reduce shear stress and limit the propagation of the dissection. Therefore, it is important to recognize these patients at the earliest possible stage. The aim of the current study was to assess the clinical characteristics, diagnostics, treatment, and outcomes of patients with painless TBAAD.

Methods

Patient Selection

The International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD) is an ongoing multinational registry designed to provide a representative population of patients with acute aortic dissection. The rationale, design, and methods of IRAD have been previously published [5]. The diagnosis of TBAAD was based on clinical symptoms, diagnostic imaging, direct visualization during surgery, and/or postmortem examination. Patients were enrolled at diagnosis or retrospectively. We analyzed all TBAAD patients enrolled in IRAD from January 1996 to July 2012 and selected those patients presenting without any pain symptoms. Demographics, medical history, presenting symptoms, management, and outcomes were compared between patients presenting with and without pain.

Statistical Analysis

Categorical variables were compared for both groups utilizing the chi-squared tests and Fisher's exact tests. Student's t-test was used to analyze continuous variables and the nonparametric test of medians to analyze non-normally distributed variables. A p-value <0.05 was considered significant. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were plotted to estimate survival. Data analysis was performed with the use of SPSS statistical analysis software (SPSS Inc, Chicago, Ill).

Results

Among the 1162 TBAAD patients enrolled in IRAD, 43 patients presented with painless TBAAD (3.7%). The mean age of patients with painless TBAAD was significantly higher than normal TBAAD patients (69.2 versus 63.3 y; p-value = 0.020, Tables 13). Painless patients presented more often with a history of diabetes, (17.9% versus 7.5%; P = 0.018), atherosclerosis (46.4% versus 30.1%; P = 0.022), and were more often diagnosed with a known prior aortic aneurysm (31% versus 18.8%; P = 0.049) Painless patients presented less frequently with hypertension (45.9% versus 68.8%; P = 0.003) and with a lower mean systolic blood pressure (mean 147.28 mm/Hg versus 166.8.2 mm/Hg; P = 0.003). Syncope was more represented in the painless group (10.3% versus 2.5%; P = 0.020).

Table 1.

Demographics and Patient History

Category Type B
Demographics Not Painless (%) Painless (%) p-value
Patients (n) 1119 43
Age (mean±SD) 63.3±14.1 69.2±10.8 0.020
Gender – male 773 (66.9) 25 (58.1) 0.234
Race – non-white 913 (82.7) 35 (85.4) 0.657
Hypertension 918 (80.2) 37 (86.0) 0.348
Diabetes 85 (7.5) 7 (17.9) 0.018
Marfan syndrome 41 (3.6) 0 (0.0) 0.396
Atherosclerosis 339 (30.1) 20 (46.5) 0.022
Known aortic aneurysm 212 (18.8) 13 (31.0) 0.049
Prior AAD 90 (8.0) 3 (7.3) 1.000
Aortic valve disease 69 (6.1) 4 (10.3) 0.302
Other aortic disease 23 (2.3) 3 (8.6) 0.051
Family history of aortic disease 48 (11.6) 1 (10.0) 1.000
Prior cath/angiography 98 (10.3) 6 (21.4) 0.061
Prior CABG 49 (4.4) 1 (2.6) 1.000
Prior surgery for aortic aneurysm/dissection 145 (13.1) 6 (14.6) 0.775
Intramural hematoma 131 (11.7) 6 (14.0) 0.654
Iatrogenic AAD 14 (1.3) 8 (19.5) <0.001
Hours presentation to diagnosis (median) 19.0 (12.7–25.3) 34.0 (22.8–72) 0.006

i] AAD indicates acute aortic dissection; CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting.

Table 2.

Presenting Symptoms/Signs of Aortic Dissection

Type B
Category Not Painless (%) Painless (%) p-value
Presenting hypertensive 763 (68.8) 17 (45.9) 0.003
Presenting hypotensive 80 (7.3) 4 (10.0) 0.532
Mean systolic blood pressure 166.8 147.2 0.003
Mean systolic blood pressure 91.44 85.0 0.095
Presented with pulse deficits 173 (18.6) 2 (8.3) 0.286
Shock 11 (1.0) 1 (2.7) 0.327
Syncope 28 (2.5) 4 (10.3) 0.020
Cerebrovascular accident 14 (1.3) 2 (5.1) 0.100
Ischemic peripheral neuropathy 31 (2.8) 0 (0) 0.622
Spinal cord ischemia 31 (2.8) 0 (0) 0.622
Limb ischemia 101 (9.3) 0 (0) 0.043
Acute renal failure 161 (14.8) 8 (20.0) 0.364
Table 3.

Imaging

Type B
Category Not Painless (%) Painless (%) p-value
CXR done 1002 (86.7) 37 (86.0) 0.905
    CXR normal 275 (28.1) 8 (21.6) 0.389
    CXR showed abnormal aortic contour 397 (43.9) 16 (47.1) 0.713
    CXR showed abnormal cardiac contour 141 (15.8) 2 (6.2) 0.211
ECG done 1087 (94.0) 36 (83.7) 0.006
    ECG normal 409 (38.2) 10 (28.6) 0.250
TEE done 574 (50.4) 20 (47.6) 0.724
CT done 1110 (96.2) 34 (82.9) <0.001
CT Normal 6 (0.6) 1 (3.2) 0.184
Angiography 207 (18.2) 9 (24.3) 0.345
MRI done 185 (16.7) 10 (27.8) 0.081
Periaortic hematoma identified on any imaging study 150 (14.5) 6 (16.7) 0.718
Most proximal extension:
    Aortic arch 263 (22.8) 7 (16.3) 0.318
    Left subclavian artery 577 (49.9) 19 (44.2) 0.461
    Descending 280 (24.2) 13 (30.2) 0.368
Largest diameter of descending aorta (median) 4.0 (3.5–5.0) 3.6 (3.0–4.7) 0.137

i] CXR indicates chest X-ray; ECG, electrocardiograph; TEE, transesophageal echocardiography; CT, computed tomography; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.

Diagnostics

As might be expected, the mean time interval between admission and diagnosis of aortic dissection was 34.0 hours among painless patients, as compared to 19.0 hours in the control group (P = 0.006). Computed Tomographic Angiography (CTA) was more often used as the primary diagnostic modality in the painful group (96.2 versus 82.9%, < 0.001). Previous angiography was more frequently performed in the painless group and these patients also had significantly more iatrogenic dissections (19.5 versus 1.3%; P < 0.001). The iatrogenic cause in the painless group was: Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PCTA) in three patients (37.5%), cardiac surgery in three patients (37.5%), and unknown cause in two patients (25%).

Management and Outcome

Almost two-thirds of the patients were treated medically, which did not differ between groups. (65.2 versus 65.1%; P = 0.988; Table 4.) Surgical and endovascular therapies were equally used in approximately 35% of each group. In-hospital mortality was 18.6% in the painless group, compared with an in-hospital mortality of 9.9% in the control group (P = 0.063). There were no statistically significant differences in complications between both groups. Kaplan-Meier survival curves did not demonstrate a significant difference in mortality during five-year follow-up (P = 0.960; Fig. 1).

Table 4.

Management

Type B
Category Not Painless (%) Painless (%) p-value
Medical management 754 (65.2) 28 (65.1) 0.988
Surgical management 137 (11.9) 6 (14.0) 0.676
Endovascular management 251 (21.7) 9 (20.9) 0.903
In-hospital mortality 114 (9.9) 8 (18.6) 0.063
    Medical management 57 (7.8) 3 (10.7) 0.468
    Surgery 25 (18.2) 3 (50.0) 0.089
Endovascular 31 (12.4) 2 (22.2) 0.320
Figure 1.

Kaplan Meier survival curve.

media/vol1/issue2/images/ata0021300270001.c.png

Discussion

The most common characteristic of TBAAD presentation is acute pain localized to the chest, abdomen, and back. Previous IRAD reports showed that 95.5% of all AAD patients presented with pain [5]. However, in rare instances the presentation of dissection can be atypical and our study showed that 3.7% of all TBAAD patients were painless, in contrast with previous experiences which reported an incidence up to 17% in AAD [1,2]. The lower incidence that we observed could be explained by the fact that, while this study focused only on TBAAD, previous studies focused on painless dissections in general, including a majority of patients with ascending aorta involvement (Type A acute aortic dissection), which makes up for more than 75% of the patient population [1,2]. In addition, IRAD consists of cardiovascular referral centers, specialized in the treatment of aortic dissection, where patients are referred for surgical/endovascular treatment, whereas patients who are thought to be unfit for invasive management will not be transferred to these centers. Typically, transferred patients have more complications, resulting in a relative low incidence in the IRAD database. The true incidence in the population is probably even higher, as an atypical presentation will likely result in a higher risk of death prior to the diagnosis.

The clinical presentation of dissection patients may be diverse, and sudden collapse or an altered state of consciousness have been reported to be the presenting symptom in up to 30% of all patients [6]. This report also included TAAAD patients, which are more prone to develop complications like syncope or alteration in consciousness [7]. Painless AAD, especially concerning the ascending aorta, presents more often with neurological deficits, syncope, and disturbances in consciousness. These complications influence the perception of pain, resulting in a relative high prevalence of Type A dissection in this patient category. As expected, painless Type B dissection patients did not show this clinical pattern since involvement of the head and neck vessels did not occur.

Our study showed that TBAAD painless patients are older at presentation and more often had a history of atherosclerosis. With increasing age, the incidence of painless dissections might rise, as previously reported [1]. In that study, patients who presented at significantly older age, more frequently had a history of cerebrovascular accidents, and some patients had only atypical symptoms such as dyspnea, nausea, and abdominal fullness. These three atypical clinical signs were not recorded within the IRAD registry, so we can't make any comparison.

The pathological mechanism of painless TBAAD is not well understood and multiple explanations for this phenomenon have been proposed. Our study showed that painless patients present with less hypertension. Due to low blood pressure, the propagation of the dissection might develop relatively slow, thereby reducing the wall stress, which could result in reduction of pain. Alternatively, pain will act as an acute stressor, determining an increased blood pressure. Furthermore, the perception of pain can be modulated as the adventitial layer, the site for aortic innervation, is involved by the dissection or affected by previous interventions. In addition, it is thought that other pathologies, like aneurysmatic enlargement, may influence the ability to sense pain. This possibility is supported by the higher incidence of other aortic disease and previous aortic aneurysms in our study population. Most interestingly, significantly more painless patients had a dissection of iatrogenic origin. Iatrogenic dissections are thought to occur very rarely, with Type A dissections reported in 0.04% of the patients during percutaneous coronary interventions and in 0.12 to 0.16% after cardiac surgery procedures [811]. The incidence of TBAAD in these patients is thought to be even lower. During such procedures, analgesics and sedation may alter the patient's perception of pain, increasing the incidence of painless TBAAD in this subset of patients [12].

The in-hospital mortality was 18.9% in the painless group, compared with an in-hospital mortality of 10.3% in the control group (P = 0.096). The explanation for this trend is probably 2-fold. First, the painless group tended to present at older age, which is a condition associated with a higher mortality [13]. Second, the extended delay to diagnosis and treatment, due to the difficulty in diagnosis, may have resulted in a higher mortality.

Although this study represents the first report focusing specifically on TBAAD with absence of pain at presentation, it has some limitations. Previous studies reported a higher incidence and registry data might not reflect the true incidence, since the centers are specialized in aortic dissection and therefore receive many referred patients. Furthermore, many patients may have died from a painless dissection before they were diagnosed and therefore are not registered.

Conclusion

Painless TBAAD is a relatively rare presentation of aortic dissection and is associated with a history of atherosclerosis, diabetes, iatrogenic origin, and aortic disease like aneurysm. We observed a trend in increased in-hospital mortality rate among painless TBAAD patients, which may be the result of a delay in diagnosis and any type of management due to the absence of classical symptoms. Therefore, physicians should be aware of this relatively rare presentation of TBAAD.

Conflict of Interest

Possible Conflict of Interest: IRAD is supported by grants from the University of Michigan Health System, Varbedian Fund for Aortic Research, Mardigian Foundation, and Gore Medical Inc (Flagstaff, Ariz).

References

  1.  
    Imamura H, Sekiguchi Y, Iwashita T, Dohgomori H, Mochizuki K, Aizawa K, et al. Painless acute aortic dissection. Diagnostic, prognostic and clinical implications. Circ J. 2011;75:59–66. DOI: 10.1253/circj.CJ-10-0183
  2.  
    Park SW, Hutchison S, Mehta RH, Isselbacher EM, Cooper JV, Fang J, et al. Association of painless acute aortic dissection with increased mortality. Mayo Clin Proc. 2004;79:1252–1257. DOI: 10.4065/79.10.1252
  3.  
    Lindsay J. Aortic dissection. Heart Dis Stroke. 1992;1:69–76.
  4.  
    Mészáros I, Mórocz J, Szlávi J, Schmidt J, Tornóci L, Nagy L, et al. Epidemiology and clinicopathology of aortic dissection. Chest. 2000;117:1271–1278. DOI: 10.1378/chest.117.5.1271
  5.  
    Hagan PG, Nienaber CA, Isselbacher EM, Bruckman D, Karavite DJ, Russman PL, et al. The International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD): new insights into an old disease. JAMA. 2000;283:897–903. DOI: 10.1001/jama.283.7.897
  6.  
    Hirata K, Wake M, Kyushima M, Takahashi T, Nakazato J, Mototake H, et al. Electrocardiographic changes in patients with type A acute aortic dissection. Incidence, patterns and underlying mechanisms in 159 cases. J Cardiol. 2010;56:147–153. DOI: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2010.03.007
  7.  
    Nallamothu BK, Mehta RH, Saint S, Llovet A, Bossone E, Cooper JV, et al. Syncope in acute aortic dissection: diagnostic, prognostic, and clinical implications. Am J Med. 2002;113:468–471. DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9343(02)01254-8
  8.  
    Blakeman BM, Pifarre R, Sullivan HJ, Montoya A, Bakhos M, Grieco JG, et al. Perioperative dissection of the ascending aorta: types of repair. J Card Surg. 1988;3:9–14. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8191.1988.tb00212.x
  9.  
    Pérez-Castellano N, García-Fernández MA, García EJ, Delcán JL. Dissection of the aortic sinus of Valsalva complicating coronary catheterization: cause, mechanism, evolution, and management. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1998;43:273–279. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0304(199803)43:3<273::AID-CCD7>3.0.CO;2-6
  10.  
    Still RJ, Hilgenberg AD, Akins CW, Daggett WM, Buckley MJ. Intraoperative aortic dissection. Ann Thorac Surg. 1992;53:374–380. DOI: 10.1016/0003-4975(92)90254-2
  11.  
    Yip HK, Wu CJ, Yeh KH, Hang CL, Fang CY, Hsieh KY, et al. Unusual complication of retrograde dissection to the coronary sinus of valsalva during percutaneous revascularization: a single-center experience and literature review. Chest. 2001;119:493–501. DOI: 10.1378/chest.119.2.493
  12.  
    Trimarchi S, Tsai T, Eagle KA, Isselbacher EM, Froehlich J, Cooper JV, et al. Acute abdominal aortic dissection: insight from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD). J Vasc Surg. 2007;46:913–919. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.07.030
  13.  
    Trimarchi S, Tolenaar JL, Tsai TT, Froehlich J, Pegorer M, Upchurch GR, et al. Influence of clinical presentation on the outcome of acute B aortic dissection: evidences from IRAD. J Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;53:161–168. DOI: 10.3410/f.716447806.791852805

PDF

Download the article PDF (218.82 KB)

Download the full issue PDF (19.07 MB)

Mobile-ready Flipbook

View the full issue as a flipbook (Desktop and Mobile-ready)

Cite this article as: Tolenaar JL, Hutchison SJ, Montgomery D, O'Gara P, Fattori R, Pyeritz RE, Pape L, Suzuki T, Evangelista A, Moll FL, Rampoldi V, Isselbacher EM, Nienaber CA, Eagle KA, Trimarchi S. Painless Type B Aortic Dissection: Insights From the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection. AORTA (Stamford). 2013;1(2):96-101. DOI: 10.12945/j.aorta.2013.13-014

You must be registered and logged in to leave comments.

There have been no comments posted yet

All comments will be screened and reviewed before posting. Statements, opinions, and results of studies published in AORTA Journal are those of the authors and do not reflect the policy or position of The Journal and Science International and the Editorial Board and provides no warranty as to their accuracy or reliability. Material is copyrighted and owned by Science International and cannot be used without expressed permission.